ARGUMENT SUGGESTED AOLLO 11 NEVER LANDED ON MOON

Argument 1: The American Flag is Flapping in the video, as though there is a breeze blowing through the airless, low gravity surface of the moon.

Argument 2: In one of the most Famous photos of the 1969 moon Landing video,
both Neil Armstrong and the Eagle lunar lander are reflected in Buzz Aldrin's
visor, prompting the argument that the landing was faked because while only two astronauts flew the mission,
both are visible in the picture. The question is, who took the picture?

Argument 3: If the Astronauts were in space, walking around on the moon, taking pictures, then where are all the stars? The astronauts didn't even make mention of stars during the 15 minute footage. With front row seats to the spectacular sights of space, wouldn't they have even mentioned stars, let alone take pictures of them?

Argument 4: One of the most convincing arguments in public opinion. The lunar lander, the Eagle
is photographed undisturbed on the surface on the moon. The picture was reportedly taken only a
few hours after the 1969 moon landing. Questions arise because the module is shown sitting on a relatively flat surfaceof what looks to be undisturbed lunar soil. So where is the crater? Shouldn't the lander's descent have been accompanied by a large dust cloud strong enough to have caused some kind of indentation in the surface?


Argument 5: A mission picture shows astronaut Buzz Aldrin standing on the foot pad of the Eagle's ladder.
His knees are bent which would suggest he is about to jump to the next rung. Conspiracy theorists point out that
Aldrin is seen in the Lander's shadow, yet he remains clearly visible. In addition to many strange looking shadow
pictures, some shadows don't seem to be parallel to each other. In addition, some objects which should be 'shadowed'
appear well lit, prompting the suggestion that the light was coming from multiple light sources, such as studio lights.

Argument 6: The telling Boot. This theory surrounds an image of Buzz Aldrin's boot as he lifts his foot to record an image for studying the moon's soil properties. Pictures from the Apollo mission show several well defined boot prints made on the lunar surface. Too defined, according to some sceptics who state the astronauts' boot prints are a bit too well defined and clear. They were imprinted in a bone dry world, for a print to be as well formed as those photographed on the Apollo mission, the imprinted material could have only been wet sand or something similar.

Argument 7: Not a very strong argument, but an argument none the less.
When Armstrong and Aldrin departed from their July 1969 mission, they left behind part of the Eagle,
the U.S. flag, and along with a few instruments and several mementos. Among them a seismometer
that is depicted in of the Mission photos as Aldrin adjusts the piece of equipment.
Skeptics argue that with today's technology and that of telescopes such as the Hubble Space Telescope
capable of peering into vastly distant parts of the universe, scientists should definitely be able to see the
these still on the moon, yet no sightings have yet been made, or at least reported - not even by NASA.

Argument 8: In an image of Buzz Aldrin setting up a foil sheet for collecting solar pictures near the eagles,
strange patterns of light appear in the upper left part of the photo. According to Conspiracy theorists, this is strong evidence of a 'studio' hoax as those unexplained reflections
come from studio lights on a production set.